What is a domain-specific AI agent?
A domain-specific AI agent is designed to perform work within a defined business area rather than provide general conversation. It combines an AI model with organization-specific knowledge, terminology, rules, tools, permissions, and operating boundaries.
How is a domain-specific agent different from a chatbot?
A chatbot primarily focuses on conversation. A domain-specific agent may also retrieve business information, investigate a case, interact with software, use tools, maintain context, follow rules, perform approved actions, and escalate work to people.
Can OST turn our existing AI prototype into a domain-specific agent?
Yes. OST can assess an existing chatbot, RAG application, proof-of-concept, or agent and determine which components should be retained, strengthened, refactored, or replaced. The goal is to preserve proven functionality while adding the domain knowledge, tools, integrations, and production controls required for the intended role.
Do we need to fine-tune an AI model with our company data?
Not necessarily. Many domain-specific systems can be built using strong instructions, RAG, structured data, APIs, business rules, and tool access. Fine-tuning is considered when testing shows it provides a meaningful improvement in quality, consistency, latency, cost, or another requirement.
Can the agent use our existing documents and internal systems?
Yes. Depending on the use case and available access, agents can work with approved documents, policies, manuals, databases, knowledge bases, product information, historical records, and business applications.
What happens when information sources disagree?
OST can define source-authority rules, validation steps, confidence requirements, and escalation paths. The agent may prioritize a designated source, identify the conflict, request more information, or escalate rather than silently choosing an unsupported answer.
Do we need multiple AI agents?
Not always. A single agent is usually preferable when one clearly defined role can complete the task reliably. Multi-agent systems are useful when responsibilities are genuinely different and separating them improves quality, control, or maintainability.
How do you stop an agent from taking the wrong action?
Controls may include limited tool permissions, role based access, deterministic validation, action limits, confirmation steps, human approval, execution ceilings, logging, and rollback or fallback procedures. The level of control depends on the impact of the action.
How do you measure whether the agent is successful?
Success is measured according to the role the agent performs. Relevant metrics may include task-completion rate, answer accuracy, retrieval quality, action accuracy, processing time, manual effort, escalation rate, failure rate, user satisfaction, and cost per successful task.